Hugh Nibley didn't like the LDS art world.
Hate to break it to you, but he was right, as he was often.
LDS artwork is terrible. No, that doesn't mean I don't agree with the theology, no that doesn't mean I'm leaving the church. But that does mean-well, it means the artwork is terrible. I'm talking about the campy pictures you see everywhere. They look cheesy, folksy and not done by someone who really has the "eye" for artwork.
I just moved back to the south, the only place that truly feels "home" to me . Home really is where you make it. I already have a few Sailor Jerry (Surprise!) posters, and I was looking for some LDS artwork. Not photos or pictures of the temple.
Yes, art is subjective. Yes, sacred pictures of the prophet and Jesus Christ should be sacred. I also agree that my taste in art is a little weird. Anything from American traditional tattoos to abstract modernism paintings (Jackson Pollack, Arshile Gorky). I also have a thing for 50's retro style. So yes, my taste is a little out there.
I also have the artistic talent of a...well, something that has no talent. So yes, I'm a critic without talent. But that's part of being a critic. Those who can't do teach, and those who can't teach write about things.
No comments:
Post a Comment